73 pages • 2 hours read
Albert CamusA modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Meursault listens to the closing arguments from the prosecution and the defense. He notes that there is not “any very great difference” (77) between the two speeches. The lawyer advises Meursault to remain quiet, even though Meursault wants to speak up in his own defense. The prosecutor tries to convince the jury that Meursault’s crime was premeditated due to Meursault’s criminal mentality, as evidence by his lack of emotion and regret. Meursault is confused as to why the prosecutor seems so determined to paint him as an emotionless void who has no soul. The prosecutor compares Meursault unfavorably to the parent killer whose trial will come next, equating the two crimes as he also blames Meursault for the death of his mother. He claims that there is no place in society for a man who flaunts the basic rules and principles as Meursault does. The prosecutor calls for the death penalty to be imposed on Meursault.
Meursault stands and delivers a response, claiming he never intended to become a murderer. The judge thanks Meursault for his contribution. Meursault’s lawyer shrugs as Meursault launches into a confused, slurring defense of his actions that no one understands. The lawyer asks for the trial to be adjourned to the next day.
By Albert Camus